Possible Ruling Could Overturn Key Charges and Alter the Rapper’s Legal Future

A Possible Turning Point in Diddy’s Legal Battle

September 27, 2025: Federal Judge Arun Subramanian is considering a motion to overturn rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs’ two convictions tied to prostitution charges. The judge signaled that a ruling could come soon, potentially altering the outcome of a high-profile trial that has drawn widespread attention and controversy.

What He’s Convicted Of (and What He’s Not)

Combs was convicted in July of violating the Mann Act by arranging transportation across state lines for individuals engaged in prostitution. However, more severe charges—including sex trafficking and racketeering—were dropped by the jury.

Defense Arguments: First Amendment, Mann Act, and Procedure

His legal team claims that the convictions should be vacated because Combs’ conduct—filming the sexual encounters rather than directly participating—should be protected under the First Amendment. They also argue that the Mann Act has been misapplied in his case and point to procedural issues, such as the timing for raising certain defenses.

What’s at Stake in the Ruling

If Judge Subramanian agrees with the defense, it could result in vacating the convictions or granting Combs a new trial. Combs is scheduled for sentencing on October 3, 2025. His legal team is also pushing for a reduced sentence—about 14 months—with credit given for the time he’s already served.

Broader Implications

This move could have ripple effects beyond Combs’ case:

It could prompt scrutiny of how the Mann Act is used in modern legal contexts, especially in cases involving adult consensual activity and recording.

The role of First Amendment claims in criminal cases involving sexual conduct may be tested more broadly.

The decision could impact ongoing public perception and sentencing norms for high-profile figures accused of sexual misconduct-related offenses.

This development marks a critical juncture in the case. With the judge said to be ruling “very shortly,” supporters and critics alike are watching closely to see whether the convictions will stand, be vacated, or lead to a new trial.