Court filings in Blake Lively’s lawsuit reveal private texts allegedly showing Taylor Swift using an expletive to describe Justin Baldoni, sparking major attention.

Private Messages Become Public Evidence

January 21, 2026 — Newly revealed court filings connected to a legal dispute involving Blake Lively have ignited widespread discussion after text messages referencing Taylor Swift and Justin Baldoni surfaced. According to the filings, Swift allegedly referred to Baldoni using an expletive in private communications, language that has since drawn intense scrutiny after becoming part of the public record.

The messages were included as supporting material in the ongoing lawsuit, offering a rare glimpse into behind-the-scenes conversations among high-profile Hollywood figures. While the texts were not originally intended for public view, their release has quickly become a focal point of the case.

Image Credit: Getty Images

How Taylor Swift Became Involved

Swift is not a party to the lawsuit, but her name appears in the filings due to her close friendship with Lively. The texts, as presented in court documents, reportedly reflect frustration surrounding professional and personal tensions connected to the dispute.

Legal observers stress that the inclusion of such messages does not imply wrongdoing by Swift. Instead, the texts are being used to illustrate the emotional climate and interpersonal dynamics surrounding the conflict at the time.

Image Credit: timesofindia

The Context of the Legal Dispute

The lawsuit involving Lively and Baldoni centers on alleged professional disagreements and conduct issues tied to a shared project. While specific claims continue to be contested, both sides have submitted extensive documentation to support their respective positions.

The appearance of celebrity text messages in the filings underscores how personal communications can become pivotal in legal proceedings, particularly when they shed light on intent, perception, or emotional responses.

Image Credit: Cindy Ord/Getty

Public Reaction and Media Attention

Once news of the texts broke, social media reactions were swift. Fans debated the appropriateness of private language being dissected in court, while others focused on how celebrity involvement can amplify the visibility of legal cases.

Swift’s supporters were quick to note that the alleged comment occurred in a private context, emphasizing that off-the-cuff remarks are rarely meant for public interpretation. Others highlighted the broader issue of privacy erosion when lawsuits involve public figures.

Legal Experts Weigh In

Legal analysts point out that emotionally charged language in private texts is not uncommon and does not necessarily carry legal weight on its own. However, such messages can influence public perception once they enter the record, especially when they involve globally recognized names.

In this case, the texts are reportedly being used to demonstrate sentiment rather than serve as direct evidence of misconduct. The ultimate significance of the messages will depend on how the court evaluates their relevance to the claims at hand.

Image Credit: Entertainment Weekly

What Happens Next

As the lawsuit progresses, more details may emerge, though it remains unclear whether Swift will be referenced further in proceedings. For now, the revelation serves as a reminder of how even private exchanges can resurface under legal scrutiny.

The case continues to unfold, with attention likely to remain high as long as well-known figures are mentioned in court documents. Whether the focus stays on the central legal issues or shifts toward celebrity involvement will become clearer as the proceedings move forward.