Legendary singer objects to use of his 1986 hit in controversial AI-video.

October 21, 2025: Iconic rock singer Kenny Loggins is publicly calling for the immediate removal of his hit song Danger Zone from an AI-generated video posted by Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. The clip shows a digitally created version of Trump wearing a crown and piloting a jet labeled “King Trump,” dropping what appears to be brown sludge over crowds of protesters during the nationwide “No Kings” rallies.

What’s the Issue?

Loggins says he never gave permission for his performance to be used in the video, which features “Danger Zone” playing over the entire sequence. In a statement on his official website, he wrote:

“This is an unauthorized use of my performance of ‘Danger Zone.’ Nobody asked me for my permission, which I would have denied, and I request that my recording on this video is removed immediately.”

He added that the video’s content appeared designed to divide people, rather than bring them together:

“Too many people are trying to tear us apart, and we need to find new ways to come together. We’re all Americans, and we’re all patriotic…”

Video Goes Viral, Sparks Backlash

The AI-generated clip was shared amid mass protests under the “No Kings” banner, where millions across the U.S. demonstrated against perceived authoritarianism. The video’s controversial imagery—Trump dumping sludge on peaceful demonstrators—and its use of Loggins’ song have triggered widespread criticism from commentators, activists and other artists alike.

The White House responded to media inquiries by sending a Top Gun-themed meme reading “I FEEL THE NEED FOR SPEED,” a playful reference to the film that made the song famous.

Why It Matters

Artists’ rights under pressure: Loggins’ demand highlights how musicians are increasingly battling the unauthorized political use of their work, especially in the age of AI-driven media.

Copyright meets politics: The video raises critical questions about consent, association and the use of entertainment assets in political messaging without authorization.

Societal impact: Loggins framed his objection as more than copyright—it was about the social context of how his music was used. He expressed dismay at its association with a message he considers divisive rather than unifying.

What’s Next?

As of now, the video remains hosted on Trump’s platform despite Loggins’ request. The singer may further explore legal options if the content isn’t removed. Observers will be watching whether the clip stays online or is pulled down—and what precedent this may set for artists confronting political misuse of their work.