Who Is Cecilia Steen Epstein Email Logs in Epstein Files

Cecilia Steen

February 4, 2026: Search interest around Cecilia Steen has surged following the release of new Jeffrey Epstein–related documents. Many readers are asking who Cecilia Steen is, why her name appears in the files, and what the records actually prove.

Image Credit: Business Insider

Who Is Cecilia Steen in the Epstein Files?

The name “Cecilia Steen” appears in several publicly released Epstein-related documents, but it does not connect to a confirmed public biography. In some emails her name also appears as Cecilia Schott. Multiple people around the world share this name, and there is no reliable evidence tying the documents to a specific, publicly known individual.

For that reason, researchers and journalists generally treat “Cecilia Steen” exactly as she appears in the records: a name associated with limited administrative and personal references, not a defined public figure.

What Does the Cecilia Steen Epstein Email Say?

One of the most searched items is a June 22, 2016 email sent from “Cecilia Steen” to Jeffrey Epstein’s personal Gmail account, jeevacation@gmail.com. The subject line reads “Hi from London.”

According to the document, the message is short and personal. It greets Epstein from London, expresses sympathy regarding a lawsuit involving Donald Trump, and conveys emotional support. The tone resembles a friendly or caring note rather than a business or legal communication.

Crucially, the email does not explain how long the sender knew Epstein, whether she worked for him, or what her broader role may have been.

Was Cecilia Steen an Employee or Associate?

Other Epstein-related records reference the name in operational contexts. An internal household or office manual instructs staff to “Call Cecilia Steen” to order personalized stationery, such as notepads and envelopes. This suggests a logistical or vendor-related role rather than executive authority.

Additionally, FedEx shipping records discussed during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial list “Cecilia Steen” as a sender on some packages originating from Epstein’s office. These records indicate who was listed on shipping paperwork, not who packed or sent items in practice.

Is Cecilia Steen in Flight Logs or the Epstein Black Book?

Publicly available flight logs and versions of Epstein’s address book do not clearly list “Cecilia Steen.” Her name appears far less frequently than those of central figures tied to Epstein’s activities, reinforcing the view that her presence in the records is limited.

Is Cecilia Steen Accused of Any Crime?

There is no public reporting that anyone named Cecilia Steen has been charged with or convicted of any crime related to Jeffrey Epstein. Inclusion in emails, manuals, or shipping records does not, on its own, imply wrongdoing.

Why Is the Cecilia Steen Epstein Email Being Searched?

Interest largely stems from the release of document dumps that encourage scrutiny of every name mentioned. In this case, the records show narrow administrative and personal contact, not evidence of criminal activity. Any conclusions beyond that go beyond what the documents actually show.

FAQs

Who is Cecilia Steen in the Epstein files?
A name that appears in limited email and administrative records, without a confirmed public identity profile.

Is Cecilia Steen a public figure?
No verified reporting connects the name to a specific publicly known individual.

What does the Cecilia Steen email reference show?
A short, personal-style message described as supportive in tone, not business or legal instruction.

Was she an Epstein employee?
There is no confirmed documentation proving formal employment; references suggest possible vendor or admin contact.

Does her name appear in flight logs?
Not prominently, according to widely reviewed public summaries.

Is Cecilia Steen accused of a crime?
No. There are no public criminal charges tied to the name in Epstein-related cases.

Why is the name trending now?
Because document releases prompt people to search unfamiliar names found in exhibits.

Does appearing in Epstein documents imply wrongdoing?
No. Document mention alone does not establish guilt or involvement in criminal activity.