Liam Neeson clarifies he is not anti-vaccine after narrating a controversial documentary, saying his involvement was purely professional and not a reflection of his personal beliefs.

Neeson Addresses Growing Backlash

December 12, 2025: Liam Neeson is speaking out after facing criticism for narrating a documentary widely described as anti-vaccine. The actor firmly denied sharing the film’s stance, telling fans and reporters that he is “not anti-vaccine” and that his participation was strictly a professional narration job taken without full awareness of how the project would be framed.

The controversy erupted soon after the documentary’s release, prompting speculation about Neeson’s personal views — speculation he is now clearing up directly.

“My Views Haven’t Changed”

Neeson emphasized that he has always trusted medical professionals and continued to support vaccination efforts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. He said he was disheartened to see his name attached to messaging that contradicts his long-held beliefs.

According to Neeson, the script he was given to record did not explicitly present itself as anti-vaccine, and he only became aware of the broader narrative once the film premiered.

HOLR has the latest news on how celebrities navigate backlash tied to projects that shift tone or message after production.

A Professional Job Misrepresented

The actor explained that narrators are often hired early in the editing process, before a film is finalized. In this case, he recorded lines as written, assuming the documentary would take a balanced, research-driven approach. Instead, critics say the final cut leaned heavily into misinformation.

Neeson said he regrets the confusion and reiterated that narration does not equal endorsement.

Fans Respond to His Clarification

Supporters quickly voiced relief, noting that Neeson has never previously aligned himself with anti-science messaging. Many defended the actor, arguing that narration gigs can sometimes obscure the narrator’s actual stance.

Others urged him to be more selective with future documentary roles to avoid unintentional association with controversial topics.

HOLR notes that this incident highlights an increasingly common issue: how celebrity involvement is interpreted in the age of polarized public discourse.

Industry Reactions

Documentary filmmakers and narrators also weighed in, saying this case serves as a cautionary tale about transparency in production and final edits. Some defended Neeson, noting that actors often have limited control over how their voice work is eventually used.

The producers of the documentary have not publicly responded to Neeson’s statement.

A Call for Responsible Storytelling

Neeson used the moment to encourage creators to present factual information responsibly, especially on topics with public-health implications. He expressed concern that misinformation — whether intentional or not — can cause real harm.

Neeson Moves Forward

Despite the controversy, Neeson said he remains focused on his upcoming film projects and hopes the clarification puts rumors to rest. He thanked fans for their support and reiterated that his participation was professional, not ideological.

What are the biggest stories trending online today? Read the latest here

Published by HOLR Magazine

Image Credit: Reddit