Sean “Diddy” Combs: Prosecutors Deliver Closing Arguments in High-Stakes Trial

June 27, 2025: As the federal trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs nears its conclusion in Manhattan, prosecutors have delivered their powerful closing arguments, painting a damning portrait of the music mogul as the ringleader of a criminal enterprise. Here’s what unfolded in court:

A Criminal Enterprise Led by Power, Violence & Fear

Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik presented a nearly five-hour closing statement, describing Combs as the head of an operation fueled by power, violence, and fear. She argued he used his celebrity status to orchestrate sex trafficking, racketeering, drug distribution, forced labor, and witness tampering over two decades.

Key points included:

Graphic details from former assistants (“Mia” and “Jane”) and ex-girlfriends Cassie Ventura and Jane, who described coerced, drug-fueled “freak-offs” involving male escorts.

Evidence of physical abuse, including a 2016 hotel incident involving Ventura and reports of assault against Jane.

Allegations of attempts to intimidate witnesses—Combs texted and called ex-abused partners urging them to play down their experiences.

The Prosecution’s Toughest Claims

Sex trafficking counts hinge on any single incident of coercion, not just repeated abuse.

Racketeering allegations point to a broad criminal enterprise involving bribery, kidnapping, arson, and obstruction.

As Savvik told jurors: it’s “time to hold him accountable,” stating Combs will only face justice now that his wealth and influence can no longer shield him.

What Comes Next?

Defense’s turn: Combs’ lead attorney, Marc Agnifilo, will deliver closing arguments as the jury hears from the defense.

Jury deliberations: May begin late Friday or early next week. A unanimous verdict is required.

Potential outcome: Combs faces up to life in prison if convicted on the most serious charges.

Why It Matters

This trial represents one of the most significant celebrity criminal cases in recent memory. The prosecution’s closing arguments signal their confidence in the breadth and weight of evidence. If the jury agrees, an influential figure in entertainment could face severe consequences.