The Michael Jackson biopic ‘Michael’ delivers powerful performances and nostalgia—but struggles with depth and controversy
A Long-Awaited Biopic Hits Screens
April 24, 2026 — The highly anticipated biographical film Michael has finally arrived, offering audiences a cinematic look into the life of the King of Pop, Michael Jackson.
Directed by Antoine Fuqua, the film traces Jackson’s journey from his early days with the Jackson 5 to the height of his global fame in the late 1980s.
While the film has generated massive buzz and strong audience turnout, its reception has been mixed—praised for its performances and music, but criticized for its storytelling choices.
View this post on Instagram
Performance: Jaafar Jackson Shines
One of the most widely praised elements of the film is the performance by Jaafar Jackson, who plays his legendary uncle.
Critics and audiences alike have noted his uncanny resemblance, both physically and in movement. His portrayal captures Jackson’s signature dance style, vocal tone, and stage presence with impressive accuracy.
Many reviews highlight that the film is at its strongest during performance sequences, where Jaafar fully embodies the energy that made Michael Jackson a global icon.
However, some critics argue that while his physical performance is compelling, the emotional depth of the character is less developed.
Image Credit: St. Louis American
Music and Visuals: A Nostalgic Experience
Where Michael truly excels is in its music and visual spectacle.
The film features iconic tracks like “Billie Jean,” “Thriller,” and “Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough,” creating a powerful sense of nostalgia for longtime fans.
Concert recreations and musical sequences are described as electrifying, capturing the scale and energy of Jackson’s live performances.
For many viewers, these moments are the main reason to watch the film, offering a reminder of why Michael Jackson remains one of the most influential artists of all time.
Storytelling: Style Over Substance?
Despite its strengths, the film’s storytelling has been a major point of criticism.
Many reviewers describe Michael as visually impressive but narratively shallow, focusing heavily on major milestones while lacking deeper insight into Jackson’s personality and struggles.
Critics have noted that the film follows a straightforward, chronological structure that often feels rushed, moving quickly from one iconic moment to another without fully exploring their significance.
This approach has led some to compare the film to a “greatest hits” compilation rather than a fully realized biographical narrative.
Image Credit: Los Angeles Times
Controversy and Omission
Perhaps the most talked-about aspect of the film is what it leaves out.
The biopic notably avoids addressing the serious allegations that surrounded Michael Jackson later in his life.
Reports indicate that certain scenes were removed due to legal constraints tied to past settlements, which prevented their inclusion in the final cut.
This omission has sparked significant debate, with critics arguing that it results in a “sanitized” portrayal of Jackson’s life.
Others, however, support the film’s decision to focus on his artistry and early career, viewing it as a celebration rather than an investigation.
Supporting Cast and Direction
The film also features strong performances from its supporting cast, including Colman Domingo as Joe Jackson and Nia Long as Katherine Jackson.
Domingo’s portrayal of Michael’s father has been particularly praised for adding emotional weight to the story.
Director Antoine Fuqua brings a polished, cinematic style to the film, but some critics feel that his approach prioritizes spectacle over emotional depth.
Audience vs. Critics: A Clear Divide
One of the most interesting aspects of Michael is the divide between critics and audiences.
While many critics have given the film lukewarm or negative reviews, fans have responded more positively, especially praising its music and performances.
The film has drawn strong attendance in theaters, with audiences celebrating its nostalgic appeal and emotional moments.
This contrast highlights the different expectations viewers bring to biopics—some seeking a deeper exploration, others simply wanting to relive the music and magic.
Final Verdict: Worth Watching?
Michael is a film that depends heavily on what you’re looking for.
If you’re a fan of Michael Jackson’s music and legacy, the film offers an engaging and visually captivating experience.
However, if you’re expecting a deep, nuanced exploration of his life, you may find it lacking.
Ultimately, Michael succeeds as a tribute but falls short as a comprehensive biography.
Image Credit: The Hollywood Reporter
Conclusion: A Legacy That Still Divides
In the end, Michael reflects the complexity of telling the story of one of the most iconic—and controversial—figures in music history.
It captures the brilliance of Michael Jackson’s artistry but avoids the darker aspects of his life, resulting in a film that feels both celebratory and incomplete.
As audiences continue to debate its merits, one thing is clear: Michael Jackson’s story remains as compelling and divisive as ever.
FAQs
Is the Michael movie worth watching?
Yes, especially for fans of his music and performances.
Who plays Michael Jackson?
Jaafar Jackson, his nephew.
What is the main criticism?
The film is seen as “sanitized” and lacking depth.
What is praised the most?
The music, performances, and visuals.
Does it cover controversies?
No, major controversies are largely omitted due to legal reasons.
Published by HOLR Magazine